Posted: Jun 16 2006, 08:43 PM
ProcrastinaQueen
FAT-TAY!
Posts: 1445
Joined: 12-May 06
College: New College CA
QUOTE (Don_Arturo @ Jun 15 2006, 10:47 PM)
Sometimes you just gotta do whatcha gotta do, as they knew that they couldn't deal with the strain of a pregnancy or a child.
So abortion's cool when you can't deal with the stress of a pregnancy long enough to give the child up for adoption?
Thanks, dude. You just killed me.

Talk to you later.
Posted: Jun 16 2006, 09:43 PM
Don_Arturo
belligerent
Posts: 9587
Joined: 29-March 05
College: Maryland
That's cool, you're entitled to your opinion. My point is, just don't force your opinion onto others, which is what pro-lifers wanna do. Give people the option, not like everyone's gonna go around killin babies for the hell of it.
Posted: Jun 16 2006, 09:46 PM
ibbangin
King of the South
Posts: 4573
Joined: 6-February 06
College: Tampa
QUOTE (Don_Arturo @ Jun 16 2006, 09:43 PM)
not like everyone's gonna go around killin babies for the hell of it.
cannibaldan?
This post has been edited by ibbangin on Jun 16 2006, 09:47 PM
Posted: Jun 16 2006, 10:34 PM
hett
passed out
Posts: 17548
Joined: 9-June 04
College: Virgin Islands
QUOTE (Don_Arturo @ Jun 16 2006, 10:43 PM)
That's cool, you're entitled to your opinion. My point is, just don't force your opinion onto others, which is what pro-lifers wanna do. Give people the option, not like everyone's gonna go around killin babies for the hell of it.
Your whole theory undermines the idea of a Democracy by saying people shouldn't try and persuade people to their opinion.
Posted: Jun 16 2006, 11:25 PM
bx
caitybug02 (4:05:09 PM): get it off thereeeeee.
BANNED
Posts: 5444
Joined: 13-May 04
QUOTE (ibbangin @ Jun 16 2006, 11:46 PM)
cannibaldan?
he said killing, not eating
Posted: Jun 16 2006, 11:35 PM
ibbangin
King of the South
Posts: 4573
Joined: 6-February 06
College: Tampa
QUOTE (bx @ Jun 16 2006, 11:25 PM)
he said killing, not eating
wouldnt eating it kill it anyway?
Posted: Jun 16 2006, 11:43 PM
bx
caitybug02 (4:05:09 PM): get it off thereeeeee.
BANNED
Posts: 5444
Joined: 13-May 04
QUOTE (ibbangin @ Jun 17 2006, 01:35 AM)
wouldnt eating it kill it anyway?
kill two birds with one stone, then... they get their abortion, cannibaldan gets his dinner... everyone's happy
Posted: Jun 16 2006, 11:48 PM
ibbangin
King of the South
Posts: 4573
Joined: 6-February 06
College: Tampa
QUOTE (bx @ Jun 16 2006, 11:43 PM)
kill two birds with one stone, then... they get their abortion, cannibaldan gets his dinner... everyone's happy
he may have a new biznass opp there........
Posted: Jun 17 2006, 12:05 AM
junkiecosmonaut
Where is your god now?
Posts: 10000
Joined: 24-July 04
QUOTE (Don_Arturo @ Jun 15 2006, 09:16 AM)
Dear Slackers,
Please remove all references of God and other religious discussions from this thread, as the two subjects are supposed to remain seperate. You wouldn't go discussin the pros of the KKK in a thread about MLK, now would you?
Respectfully yours,
The US Constitution
Please stop attributing things to me that make absolutely no goddamn sense.
Sincerely,
The US Constitution
PS - No, really, it's me this time I swear.
Posted: Jun 17 2006, 06:04 AM
jbgeddings
sober
Posts: 66
Joined: 8-June 06
Ok, I agree that the mother has a right to decide but so does the father. If God exists and he made us the way he did then guess what? It take one woman and one man to make a child.

If Mommy dearest decides to abort and the daddy dearest does too then it equal out but if daddy wants to abort or keep it he doesn't get the same right as mommy does. They currently have an on going case on paternal rights to a child and it also covers child support. Before "our" government decides on if it is alright to have abortions, shouldn't we first know what rights we have to a child? I am neither for or against abortion since none of us would be here if our parents did it, however if said daddy can't support it and neither can mommy. then why bring the child into the world to have a ghetto fabulous life?
The child does not have a choice at the moment it's in the womb and frankly when I was a child I couldn't do shiat without having the parents' permission or I would get the shiat knocked out of me. So are we going to argue that the child has rights when most children don't have rights when they are young? Granted we now have way too many laws dealing with children protection, i.e. can't play somewhere without mommy or daddy watching - meaning no more playing doctor with your grade school friend at such an early age, have to wait until... hell high school nowadays for some privacy.
Maybe I just bitter about some things like this because I have best friends and personal experiences with this but you don't hear people like me getting up there in politics so

the current politicans and let the new age that deals with these issues into the government and let the people that this affects have a damn say. Basically : "Mom, Dad, get the f^^k out of the way and let us live our own damn lives."
Posted: Jun 17 2006, 01:01 PM
ProcrastinaQueen
FAT-TAY!
Posts: 1445
Joined: 12-May 06
College: New College CA
QUOTE (jbgeddings @ Jun 17 2006, 05:04 AM)
I am neither for or against abortion since none of us would be here if our parents did it, however if said daddy can't support it and neither can mommy. then why bring the child into the world to have a ghetto fabulous life?
Uhhh...because they don't have to, duh.
There are laws in place that make it REDICULOUSLY easy for parents who can't deal with or afford to raise a child to give it up.
ps: did you say earlier in that post that parents should have a right to kill their kids because kids don't have a right to do anything without their parent's permission anyways?
I'm afraid for our future.
This post has been edited by ProcrastinaQueen on Jun 17 2006, 01:03 PM
Posted: Jun 19 2006, 12:39 AM
jbgeddings
sober
Posts: 66
Joined: 8-June 06
There are some laws in different states to make it easier however, when one parent wants it and the other doesn't then what happens? Someone pays, or if the father wants it and the mother doesn't the father doens't get the choice. I think if women want everything equal then the laws should do just that. Personal issue, sorry for the rant.
As for kids rights, I never said killing kids were right because they don't have rights in the first place. I meant they didn't have the choice to begin with. Mommy and daddy have that choice. Would you really bring a child into this world if you couldn't provide for it to the point of poverty?
Posted: Jun 19 2006, 01:13 AM
Posts:
Joined: --
im not for abortion - but adoption is the best thing if you know you cant raise a kid - a friend's sister had a little boy two years ago, yeah she 'watches' him and stuff, but he hates being around her, her mom (his grandma) watches him all day and takes care of him. and now im starting to help out with him too... today he pushed away from her and ran to me, kinda awkward, but she doesn't really care... kinda sad..
what's more sad is that she's pregnant again.... she doesn't belive in birth control in any form, pills, condoms or anything, she just 'free-balls' it....
Posted: Jun 19 2006, 01:16 AM
donvito
How are ya, Bob?
Posts: 12199
Joined: 23-December 04
College: SIU Carbondale
QUOTE (foxgirl005 @ Jun 19 2006, 02:13 AM)
what's more sad is that she's pregnant again.... she doesn't belive in birth control in any form, pills, condoms or anything, she just 'free-balls' it....
catholic?
Posted: Jun 19 2006, 01:18 AM
Posts:
Joined: --
QUOTE (donvito @ Jun 19 2006, 01:16 AM)
catholic?
nope... bipolar...
she thinks taking pills will mess up her head, and she won't trust condoms i guess, but i have no clue really....
Posted: Jun 19 2006, 01:20 AM
bx
caitybug02 (4:05:09 PM): get it off thereeeeee.
BANNED
Posts: 5444
Joined: 13-May 04
QUOTE (foxgirl005 @ Jun 19 2006, 03:18 AM)
nope... bipolar...
she thinks taking pills will mess up her head, and she won't trust condoms i guess, but i have no clue really....
maybe she'll just do us all a favor and commit suicide
Posted: Jun 19 2006, 01:22 AM
Posts:
Joined: --
maybe she just might..... but her kid is cute as hell!! i love the little guy, she's messed up in the head tho - she's flipping quarters to figure out who the father is of this one.....
Posted: Jun 19 2006, 01:22 AM
donvito
How are ya, Bob?
Posts: 12199
Joined: 23-December 04
College: SIU Carbondale
QUOTE (foxgirl005 @ Jun 19 2006, 02:18 AM)
nope... bipolar...
she thinks taking pills will mess up her head, and she won't trust condoms i guess, but i have no clue really....
im still going with catholic
Posted: Jun 19 2006, 01:29 AM
ibbangin
King of the South
Posts: 4573
Joined: 6-February 06
College: Tampa
QUOTE (foxgirl005 @ Jun 19 2006, 01:22 AM)
she's messed up in the head tho - she's flipping quarters to figure out who the father is of this one.....
sounds like a classy lady
Posted: Jun 19 2006, 09:29 AM
kmatt_333
...sportin' a pocket full of change...
Posts: 2852
Joined: 17-June 04
QUOTE (donvito @ Jun 19 2006, 02:22 AM)
im still going with catholic
Every sperm is sacred, every sperm is great....
When a sperm is wasted, God gets quite irate.
Posted: Jun 19 2006, 11:49 PM
jake
Angry, Gun-Toting, Meat Eating, Beer Drinking Liberal
Posts: 11617
Joined: 2-June 04
College: MSU
QUOTE (kmatt_333 @ Jun 19 2006, 11:29 AM)
Every sperm is sacred, every sperm is great....
When a sperm is wasted, God gets quite irate.
Let the heathens spill theirs on the dusty ground, but God will make them pay for each sperm that can't be found.
Posted: Jun 19 2006, 11:55 PM
empresss
beyyyaaaaaaaaah!
Posts: 4174
Joined: 15-August 05
Religion has no place in federal/municipal law. We must allow for free will & free choice.
Posted: Jun 20 2006, 12:46 AM
hett
passed out
Posts: 17548
Joined: 9-June 04
College: Virgin Islands
QUOTE (empresss @ Jun 20 2006, 12:55 AM)
Religion has no place in federal/municipal law. We must allow for free will & free choice.
Thou shall not kill is a commandment, and it is against the law as well. There can be overlap from one to another. Also, many people derive their opinion, based on their faith. Saying that one cannot use their faith as a guide toward creating law is the same as saying one that does not believe in god has no place in government.
I draw the line at practicality. Thou shall not kill makes sense, we probably would have that as a law regardless of it being a commandment. But there are many other biblical laws that would have no place in the US law. Using the bible as a soul source of why something should be a law has no place in our country. But since I am pretty sure there is no mention of abortion in the bible, and many non-religious people have a problem with abortion, I can respect (most of them at least) the pro-life movement.
And I'm done with this thread.
Posted: Jun 20 2006, 12:47 AM
ProcrastinaQueen
FAT-TAY!
Posts: 1445
Joined: 12-May 06
College: New College CA
The topic at hand, however, has nothing to do with religion.
It has to do with whether an unborn child is actually a child or not and whether parents make the choice to kill, raise, or give up said child.
Posted: Jun 20 2006, 02:33 AM
sarcastro
sober
Posts: 29
Joined: 19-June 06
QUOTE (ProcrastinaQueen @ Jun 20 2006, 12:47 AM)
The topic at hand, however, has nothing to do with religion.
It has to do with whether an unborn child is actually a child or not and whether parents make the choice to kill, raise, or give up said child.
What's wrong with selling the kid?